What do you think of India's IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw comparing the Indian government's efforts to build a localised AI model to sending a mission to the moon at a fraction of the cost?

Last Updated: 01.07.2025 16:59

What do you think of India's IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw comparing the Indian government's efforts to build a localised AI model to sending a mission to the moon at a fraction of the cost?

Does India have critical areas that need AI models?

Would you be able to tell me how either benefited the Indian population?

Without any of this being discussed, Ashwin going directly to cost, seems a very untenable argument

Is a man over 50 not married no kids a red flag?

Didn't the States put living people on the moon?

Your Mars mission was also inexpensive because it was extremely basic

โ€”

New discovery at the Grand Canyon has rewritten geology textbooks - Earth.com

Does India have the necessary AI Talent?

I don't think the Big 5 Companies will take that lying down and may place a lot of obstacles in India's way

Ashwin talked of the Moon mission being at a fraction of the cost but did he also talk of the objectives of the various moon missions of other countries?

Kate Middleton Glows in First Trooping the Colour After Cancer Remission - instyle.com

The only answer would be a possible advantage for ISRO, sometime in the distant future

So if you translate his speech, is he saying India would create a low cost AI model which will fulfil some very basic objectives and not be anywhere near the level of the latest versions of GPT or Deepseek?

So i doubt India ruffled any feathers with a moon mission

Warming climate may flip the script on the amount of COโ‚‚ released by trees, study finds - Phys.org

The States and China, they did a lot more in Mars than India did in terms of exploration and study

Does India have the necessary set up in place?

Was that a comparable argument ?

Amazon Offers Fire TV Soundbar for Practically Free to Clear Out Stock Before Prime Day - Gizmodo

For one thing, moon travel is not a commercial thing and the benefits of moon travel are primarily futuristic and at a level which cannot be immediately monetized

A second point is - the Moon Mission was inexpensive because it was extremely basic

It is a strange argument

Grandfather, 75, Reveals the 'Tests' He Takes for Fun to Delay Signs of Dementia (Exclusive) - AOL.com

So the Minister gave an erroneous analogy which makes me wonder if he knows what he is talking about

India made a Maruti 800 that could take a trip between two places, at a lower cost that the States that had a Ferrari take the same trip long ago

Developing a Multimodal AI means challenging a 500 Billion dollar to possibly 1 Trillion dollar worth of investments made by the Big 5 Companies in the States - Google, Meta, Amazon, Oracle and Microsoft

โ‹†๐™šโ‚ŠหšโŠนโ™ก best K-pop Rappers In Your Own opinion?

Didn't the Chinese ones bring some soil back?

A Maruti 800 and a Ferrari both transport people from one point to another but their entire purpose is extremely different is it not?

โ€”

If books could kill: The poison legacy lurking in libraries - BBC

On the other hand, a mission to the moon, something already done by everyone else of consequence, is not something that would challenge anyone's interest in any way

Now India has to make a Galardo and compete with a Ferrari made by the States and a Porsche made by China

Is it not an entirely different ball game?

Trump military parade marking Army's 250th birthday takes place in Washington, D.C., today - CBS News